Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 |
181. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: PotatoOverdose wrote: As mentioned, the Eagle and the Cerb both annihilate Intys at extreme ranges. There were, however, some questions from the slower parts of the class on how a cer...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 19:00:32
|
182. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Acuma wrote: And if there's even one person in system you just play a game of jumping from gate to gate......if there's not even one person in system, why have sovereignty? you leave the system and abuse your best-in-class warp speed to get t...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:59:32
|
183. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ranger 1 wrote: Glad to hear it. Not that you did of course... as that was far from it's primary point. But you knew that already didn't you? A little secret... so does everyone else. nah, your post was "you want good fights yet you do ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:58:28
|
184. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: As mentioned, the Eagle and the Cerb both annihilate Intys at extreme ranges. There were, however, some questions from the slower parts of the class on how a cerb would hit an inty moving at, say, 137km from a TCU. ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:57:23
|
185. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Veskrashen wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Veskrashen wrote: Combat probes will land it in engagement range every time. 100km is plenty when you land within 50-70km of your target. combat probes show up on dscan the interceptor gets t...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:56:16
|
186. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Carniflex wrote: So its a problem that 1 ships cant take on 5 ships? By the same token what prevents me from "sov trolling" in falcon with covert cyno and bomber wing in jump range? interdictor bubbles
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:53:05
|
187. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ranger 1 wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Ranger 1 wrote: However, if you continue to pose your arguments as : We want good fights. this is where you've lost the thread at no point is goonswarm federation interested in good fights ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:52:11
|
188. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Acuma wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Killian Cormac wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: you don't capture command nodes, you go to other systems and generate more initial RF timers while the defenders are busy whacking pimples Which ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:51:26
|
189. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: complaining about posting is usually the first sign that you've lost control of the conversation Conversation? This is like a preschool tantrum! You and your compatriots only have yourselves to b...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:50:09
|
190. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Killian Cormac wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: you don't capture command nodes, you go to other systems and generate more initial RF timers while the defenders are busy whacking pimples Which spawn their own command nodes two days late...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:49:20
|
191. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Veskrashen wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: MASSADEATH wrote: come on a corm sniping fleet :) and it will cure your doubts ah yes the cormorant with its staggering 80-100km range Combat probes will land it in engagement range every t...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:45:15
|
192. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Well who coulda guessed this thread was gonna turn into a CFC blob screaming 'trollceptors' ad nauseam and sticking their fingers in their ears? complaining about posting is usually the first sign that you've lost control of t...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:44:18
|
193. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Killian Cormac wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Killian Cormac wrote: Interceptors will be able to do nothing to prevent organized defenders from capturing their own nodes. except generate so many more timers that the pure chaff make...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:42:48
|
194. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: PotatoOverdose wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: PotatoOverdose wrote: Look, even if you don't believe the rail boats (and the better arty and beam boats) can make intys squish at 100+...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:41:30
|
195. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ranger 1 wrote: However, if you continue to pose your arguments as : We want good fights. this is where you've lost the thread at no point is goonswarm federation interested in good fights defense of our empire comes first, subjugation o...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:40:11
|
196. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
MASSADEATH wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: MASSADEATH wrote: Deklin is a barren wasteland of empty useless space..where you could literally search for hours looking for targets outside of the main staging systems of the CFC and goons......
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:27:05
|
197. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Killian Cormac wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: you just bring interceptors to contest the capture node pimples too Interceptors will be able to do nothing to prevent organized defenders from capturing their own nodes. except generate ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:23:45
|
198. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
MASSADEATH wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: like seriously that deklein is, by far, the most inhabited and used region is an objective easily proven fact like that the sky is blue trying to argue anything else just makes you look like an idi...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:21:59
|
199. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: i'm plenty fine with this concept as long as the attacker is able to be caught and executed in a situation discounting serious pilot error interceptors do not fit this category, and the fact that th...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:20:50
|
200. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
SilentAsTheGrave wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: MASSADEATH wrote: see we are a Guerrilla force... we strike and move....strike and move... we dont bash our heads into your 30,000 man alliance head on.... why would we? "we don't do pvp...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 18:18:07
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |